Submit It is still cost to the public If we eliminate cost to public transportation it will not be free. Free means without cost. Now when you get a free sample from a shop is it without cost? No, the shopkeeper still has to pay for the free samples.
Share on Facebook Click me!
Share on Twitter Click me! Because most of their budgets come from ever-scarcer state and local tax revenues, not from fares. The New York Times reported on the damage recently: In addition to considering a 23 percent increase in fares and tolls, the authority is weighing plans to eliminate more than two dozen city bus routes and two subway lines, reduce off-peak service and even close some subway stations at night Big systems in Boston, Atlanta and San Francisco, and smaller ones across the nation, find themselves weighing cuts or fare increases that they fear could erode the gains they have made in attracting new riders.
Irwin Kellner over at the Wall Street Journal thinks the solution is to make public transportation free: Not only should fares be lowered and service improved there is a good case that can be made to eliminate fares altogether.
This is not as far-fetched as it looks. On average, the fare box covers only one-third of the cost of a typical mass transit ride.
The rest is made up with dedicated taxes, subsidies from state and local governments, and tolls. Clearly, if these sources cover two-thirds of a ride, how much do you think taxes, subsidies and tolls would have to rise to take over the remaining third?
It seems like the perfect time to expand and further subsidize service-with the understanding that any short term cash deficit is more than made up for in positive environmental externalities and the cultivation of a new ridership. We should all do what we can to make sure stimulus money is set aside to bolster them.
The zookeepers had to be incredibly careful to pull this one off. The Planet Best friends achieve childhood dream of dressing up as one man to sneak into the movies.Public Transport Should Be Free Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.
You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page. Maybe free public transit should be thought of not as a behavioral instrument, but as a right; poorer citizens have just as much of a privilege to get around conveniently as wealthier ones.
If the debate shifted from means-to-an-end thinking to pure egalitarianism, the . Roads are free, the argument goes, so the idea that public transport should also be free is obvious. It would eliminate fare evasion as an issue, increase patronage, .
Should Public Transportation Be Free?
– Ethics Essay It is a fact of life that more and more metropolitan people taking replacement of public transportations by the private cars as the main vehicles is the prevalent trend nowadays.
Maybe free public transit should be thought of not as a behavioral instrument, but as a right; poorer citizens have just as much of a privilege to get around conveniently as wealthier ones.
Public transport should not be free and paid for by the government because government cannot afford to pay for it unless other vital services to the general public are cut drastically. The possibility of free public transportation falls far below the necessities of other services and should be prioritized according to importance of maintaining a viable society.